← Back to Writing
◈ Strategy|Mar 24, 2026·2 min read·★ Featured

Why I Switched from Fixed Targets to VWAP Exits

Arbitrary dollar targets were killing my edge. Here's the math behind using VWAP gap as a structural exit — and the live results that convinced me.

The problem with fixed dollar targets is simple: they ignore market structure. A $100 target on a day where price gapped $3 from VWAP is leaving money on the table. A $100 target when the gap is $0.80 means you’re holding through noise for a move that may never come.

The formula I landed on: (Price − VWAP) × Delta = Expected P&L per contract.

With a 0.70 delta strike and a minimum $1.43 gap requirement, each contract needs to deliver roughly $1.00 of intrinsic movement to justify the entry. That’s not a guess — it’s the math.

Here’s what changed in my trading when I adopted this:

  1. Entries got more selective. The $1.43 minimum gap is a natural filter. Most of the day, SPY trades too close to VWAP for this to trigger.

  2. Exits became structural. Instead of watching P&L and hoping, I set a limit order at VWAP. Price either gets there or it doesn’t — and the stop handles the “doesn’t.”

  3. My win rate went up because I stopped taking low-conviction setups. The gap requirement forces patience.

The key insight: VWAP isn’t just an indicator. It’s where institutions are transacting. When price deviates significantly, mean reversion isn’t hope — it’s gravity.

#SPY#options#VWAP#strategy
← All Posts